Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:32:13 +0100 From: Thomas Vogt <freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch> To: Dan <dan-freebsd-fs@ourbrains.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will XFS be adopted Message-ID: <18070C72-6354-43B4-9F36-7E1BE41DDA0A@bsdunix.ch> In-Reply-To: <20081120164823.GA8513@ourbrains.org> References: <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org> <20081109184349.GG51239@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4920D879.3070806@jrv.org> <20081117050441.GA16855@ourbrains.org> <20081118175210.GA3753@hyperion.scode.org> <20081119001742.GA21835@ourbrains.org> <49235D86.4050106@modulus.org> <86bpwcp1d8.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20081120164823.GA8513@ourbrains.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Helo Am 20.11.2008 um 17:48 schrieb Dan: > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav(des@des.no)@2008.11.19 09:26:59 +0100: >> Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> writes: >>> [...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved >>> into >>> the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server. >> >> ZFS has been in 7 for over a year. >> >> DES >> -- >> Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav - des@des.no > > But is it considered stable? :) I can share my experiance: We run an official mirror server for many opensource projects. We use FreeBSD 7 including ZFS as the storage server. The system is mirroring a lot of data every day via rsync to the local zfs pool and offering all data via ftp/rsync and http to the end user. We have a few terabyte traffic every week and a lot of i/o load. After a few tweaks (vfs.zfs.arc_max etc) FreeBSD 7.x is running without any problems since a few months. Even with a few crashes at the beginning, we never encountered any data loss with zfs. I'm just talking about FreeBSD 7.x and not FreeBSD current. But current is not considered as production ready. Regards Thomas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18070C72-6354-43B4-9F36-7E1BE41DDA0A>