Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:35:38 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Shapiro <Shimon@i-Connect.Net> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, dyson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XXXminpys question Message-ID: <XFMail.970203120737.Shimon@i-Connect.Net> In-Reply-To: <199702010403.XAA02913@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi John S. Dyson; On 01-Jan-97 you wrote: > > > > > > Hi John S. Dyson; On 31-Jan-97 you wrote: > > > It will require some restructuring of the pbuf (physical I/O buffer) > > > code, but isn't that bad to do. It has been in my queue for a while. > > > If the driver-savvy people can work out a way to query the driver for > > > the maximum I/O size, I can/will implement the upper level changes. > > > > > > John Dyson > > > > Is this not the purpose of the xxx_minphys entry point to the driver? > > > > Simon > > > Yes, except is that indeed the *right* way to do it? I am suggesting > that we review that choice first. Coming to think about it, this really describes max_transfer, not min_phys. No? Simon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.970203120737.Shimon>