Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:01:51 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Danny Carroll <fbsd@dannysplace.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ZFS Drive change best practice. Message-ID: <20081122230151.GB2016@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <49249169.9010406@dannysplace.net> References: <49240A80.5010106@dannysplace.net> <20081119125138.GA86942@icarus.home.lan> <20081119211227.GA2553@garage.freebsd.pl> <49249169.9010406@dannysplace.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:21:29AM +1000, Danny Carroll wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > After some more tests I'll commit changes that make ZFS to always depend > > on metadata only. > >=20 >=20 > So I guess that means in the future, you could power down a system, > re-arrange the disk positions and when you powered back up ZFS would > just work? Yes. I committed needed changes earlier today. > Could I also ask what the usual lead time is for ZFS changes to go from > current -> stable? I'm just curious. There is no fixed time, it all depends on much testing will it receive and how many bugs will be there plus when *at() syscalls will be MFCed. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFJKI9fForvXbEpPzQRAmTYAKCH/+MPWuzjNRxu+3LJLlWLtXnF1QCfYcU1 JbCfvHf8H0YCwrq1k0gOZyw= =eFEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081122230151.GB2016>