Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 20:11:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: imp@village.org, dg@root.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971007200744.18192A-100000@hobbes.saturn-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <199710061510.IAA00329@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > *PLEASE*PLEASE*PLEASE* listen to Rod. The kernels after 2.2.5-RELEASE > > > should be called 2.2.5-STABLE. > > > > Or we could always call it 2.2.x-STABLE, to indicate that it is the most > > recent of the 2.2 branch (which is therefore, the 2.2.x branch...) > > Won't do you any good, you wont know if your post 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.5, > kinda defeats the purpose of REVISION :-(. True, but it fixes the origional problem of user CONFUSION... (2.2 vs 2.2.0 problem...) You'd have to tack a revision on there somewhere to fix the problem of "exactly what revision IS this system anyway?" FreeBSD 2.2.x-STABLE (rrrrr) r = some revision identification scheme Later...... <Doug>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971007200744.18192A-100000>