Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:11 +0000 From: Matt Smith <fbsd@xtaz.co.uk> To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnupg & pinentry Message-ID: <20141223135111.GA45509@xtaz.uk> In-Reply-To: <1419342257.1161578.206107753.2999EC08@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <CAJuc1zPtDsOQG2oAKoTVB%2BpVyox8h1mGZOW6CtMBw1GN7=vnOg@mail.gmail.com> <20141222094630.GF52267@xtaz.uk> <1419342257.1161578.206107753.2999EC08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 23 07:44, Mark Felder wrote: > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option. > >Anyone up for a weekend challenge? :-) There has been another thread on this mailing list discussing making the port honour the WITHOUT_X11 and OPTIONS_UNSET+=X11 options from make.conf which would make it only depend on security/pinentry-curses instead of security/pinentry. This seems like a good solution to me. It would mean if one of those options is set it will only drag in a single dependancy rather than all the X11 libraries and GTK. -- Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141223135111.GA45509>