Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 15:57:46 +0900 From: Atsushi Furuta <furuta@sra.co.jp> To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: itojun@itojun.org, core@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org Subject: Re: new config Message-ID: <199806090657.PAA27116@sras63.sra.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jun 1998 21:14:10 -0700" References: <199806090414.VAA00467@antipodes.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> In article <199806090414.VAA00467@antipodes.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> writes: > Newconfig imposes very strict hierarchical structure on the system, and > whilst well-geared towards a static configuration, is much less well > suited to dynamic operation (my evaluation only). Bearing in mind that > it has been at least a year since I had anything to do with newconfig, > I'd be interested in more clarification. Please tell me your definition of "static/dynamic configuration" in this context. My understanding: static configuration -> to give parameters in compile time dynamic configuration -> to give parameters in boot time Is this correct? -- furuta@sra.co.jp (Atsushi Furuta) Advanced Technology Group. Software Research Associates, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806090657.PAA27116>