Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:17:29 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: rwatson@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb with fast interrupts Message-ID: <20041112.151729.114732187.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041112220719.26498C-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20041112.150359.11373761.imp@bsdimp.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041112220719.26498C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041112220719.26498C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes:
: Sounds good to me. Scott's comments on possibly wanting a non-task worker
: may well be valid, though. Or you can do what acpi and other components
: do: use the task queue mechanism but provide their own kernel thread.
I'll do that if performance changes in any significant way. Given
that we're taking GIANT out unconditionally anyway in the taskqueue,
I'm not sure that timing really matters... It will matter more once
we push Giant further down into usb.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041112.151729.114732187.imp>