Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:51:49 +0100 (CET)
From:      Sten <sten@blinkenlights.nl>
To:        Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PC133 memory in an 164SX?
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.44-Blink.0211231348410.22117-100000@thea.blinkenlights.nl>
In-Reply-To: <arlui2$25u$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Christian Weisgerber wrote:

> I'm looking into expanding the memory in an AlphaPC164SX.  (Truth
> be told it doesn't run FreeBSD.)  As it tends to be with technology
> disappearing from the marketplace, PC100 memory is now more expensive
> than PC133.  Are there any practical or theoretical objections to
> using PC133 memory in a 164SX?
>
> I'm under the impression that the only difference between PC100 and
> PC133 are timing parameters, where PC133 is faster, so this shouldn't
> be a problem, but maybe there are hidden issues such as power
> consumption or I'm missing something altogether.

PC133 should work, I personaly have never seen breakages due
to pc133 vs 100, only due to the quality of the memory
( the c't has quite a good article about this topic ).

I myself have a 164SX with 4x 256mb of ecc memory
colocated which works perfectly.

-- 
Sten Spans

  "What does one do with ones money,
   when there is no more empty rackspace ?"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.44-Blink.0211231348410.22117-100000>