Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:44:59 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r364739 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/syslog-ng-devel sysutils/syslog-ng-devel/files Message-ID: <53EA6EBB.2010802@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <53ea6d76.6eb9.5599e7c9@svn.freebsd.org> References: <53ea6d76.6eb9.5599e7c9@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/12/2014 21:39, Cy Schubert wrote: > Author: cy > Date: Tue Aug 12 19:39:33 2014 > New Revision: 364739 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/364739 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r364739/ > > Log: > Reintroduce syslog-ng-devel for 3.6.0alpha2. > > Submitted by: Peter Czanik <peter.czanik@balabit.com> (syslog-ng upline) Do Ports really need alpha quality -devel ports in the collection? If it were up to me I'd purge 90% of our -devel ports. I tried to start a conversation about a policy for these with portmgr, but as usual, only one person responded. I'd still like to have that conversation though. This -devel port trend is disturbing. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53EA6EBB.2010802>