Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jan 1999 20:42:18 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Brian W. Buchanan" <brian@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
To:        "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The ongoing influx of SPAM into the lists.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901082036470.94886-100000@smarter.than.nu>
In-Reply-To: <19990108221752.C26154@futuresouth.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> Didn't this come up not too long ago?
> I, for one, find it useful when moving a thread (generally, to -chat), to
> Bcc the original list so they know what happened, but since it's a Bcc no
> one accidentally keeps it flowing on the old list.
> I can't be the only one who does this.  Sure, it's a convenience...  but
> I have giving up very useful convenience just because someone out there
> has to be a jerk.

Okay, so why not test for ANY freebsd.org list in the To/Cc?  The To/Cc
test is probably the most successful spamfiltering technique I've come
across since spammers wised up and stopped using "Comments: Authenticated
Sender is..."  The spammers have to use a lot more bandwidth to defeat it,
too.

-- 
Brian Buchanan                                   brian@smarter.than.nu
                                                 brian@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901082036470.94886-100000>