Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:19:50 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm Message-ID: <19D9CEFF-ED49-4310-991A-59D35EF8A242@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20140423051709.GY49791@glenbarber.us> References: <201404230201.s3N21NiE054881@svn.freebsd.org> <11A48119-4502-4EE6-A4AF-E726578380DF@gmail.com> <20140423050923.GW49791@glenbarber.us> <20140423051235.GX49791@glenbarber.us> <71240AD4-7635-4694-950D-CDD99960A013@bsdimp.com> <20140423051709.GY49791@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15:14PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>=20 >>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>> Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke = this fix it in head. >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Well, this commit only moves where the definition is, from the = script >>>> itself to the configuration file. >>>>=20 >>>> But, to be fair, I think you broke it in r264660. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> To clarify further, if it was you that did break it in head/, I am = not >>> complaining about it - I fixed the use case I need. >>>=20 >>> What I *want* to happen is for the WITH_CLANG_IS_CC and >>> WITHOUT_CLANG_IS_CC to stop conflicting with WITH_GCC, and = additional >>> convoluted and unnecessary knobs to go away. >>>=20 >>> But you already know that. :) >>=20 >> Yea, see my recent posts to arm@ on that very topic. CLANG_IS_CC >> is evil and must die. There=92s too many stupid special cases for >> clang in the build system, and it is really horking me off=85 But >> there will be fewer in about a week or so when I push my next round >> of fixes in... >>=20 >=20 > Feel free to run your changes by me for testing. I'm happy to > complain^W test. :) Will do=85 My work in progress mercurial patch queue is updating every = day or three at http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/patch-queue if you wanted a sneak peak = and had a mercurial setup already=85 But there=92s also some crazy stuff in = that=85 When I have a patch set I=92m ready to dump into make universe, I=92ll give you a = heads up. And sorry for breaking it in the first place... Warner=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19D9CEFF-ED49-4310-991A-59D35EF8A242>