Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:16:37 -0600
From:      Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com>
To:        Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Re[2]: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model)
Message-ID:  <47d0403c0602100816y6f15451coeb1f0e375339d883@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1942942743.20060210164259@rulez.sk>
References:  <200602101530.k1AFUEtr095055@freefall.freebsd.org> <1942942743.20060210164259@rulez.sk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/10/06, Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> wrote:
>
> Halo Giorgos,
>
> Friday, February 10, 2006, 4:30:14 PM, si tukal:
>
> > The following reply was made to PR docs/93014; it has been noted by
> GNATS.
>
> > From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
> > To: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com>
> > Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book
> (dev-model)
> > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:23:52 +0200
>
> >  On 2006-02-08 03:56, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> In the project model book, I found a few minor nits whilst perusing
> >> its contents.
> >>
> >> One nit is the use of "to" instead of "too" on line 2209 of the source=
.
> >
> >> >Fix:
> >> --- book.sgml   Wed Feb  8 02:38:24 2006
> >> +++ book.sgml.orig      Wed Feb  8 02:38:08 2006
> >> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@
> >>                      stability cannot be sacrificed by self-imposed
> deadlines and
> >>                      target release dates.
> >>
> >> -                    For slips of time not to become too long with
> regards to security
> >> +                    For slips of time not to become to long with
> regards to security
> >>                      and stability issues,
> >>                      extra discipline is required when committing
> changes to -STABLE.
> >
> >  Hmmm, not really.  The original text is ok.  "too long" refers to the
> >  length of a time period.  I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here.
> >
>
> looks okay to me too.



I guess I should apologize -- I made this diff hastily, and put the
arguments in the wrong order -- the original text has "to long,"
I am proposing to change it to "too long".  Unless I'm misunderstanding you=
,
here.

Ben Kaduk


--
> Cheers,
>    Daniel Gerzo
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47d0403c0602100816y6f15451coeb1f0e375339d883>