Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Aug 1999 08:22:56 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca (Tim Vanderhoek)
Cc:        cpiazza@home.net, tcole@balsam.methow.com, hodeleri@seattleu.edu, dscheidt@enteract.com, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD cures RSI
Message-ID:  <199908060822.BAA02979@usr01.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990805200540.D58583@mad> from "Tim Vanderhoek" at Aug 5, 99 08:05:40 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 02:58:34PM -0700, Chris Piazza wrote:
> > This I don't understand.  Is it really true that younger people
> > can't touch type very well?  I've been able to touch type since
> 
> No, and to the person who responded to this, no, the argument that
> "readers of -chat are non-representative of younger people" does not
> apply.  All of this younger people can't type bullshit is mostly a
> bunch of phogies trying to feel good about themselves.  They should
> stick to stories about being forced to program their Altairs through
> toggle switches and how we have it so good these days with structured
> languages.

I learned to type on a manual typewriter in 1974, which was the last
year man landed on the moon.

I type an average of 132 words a minute on an IBM Selectric, or a
computer keybard (I still have my manual; I can do 84 on it).  I
type slightly faster, if I'm writing prose, or taking dictation.

Without fail, the most common comment I get when someone interupts
me typing (it was a technical writer, yesterday) is "Gee, you're a
fast typist".

For comparison, one of the girls in my typing class typed around 185
words a minute (on a manual typewriter!) and compared to her speed,
I always felt like a slug.  I suspect that if she is still typing on
computers today, she is probably only slightly less than twice as
fast as I am.  8-(.

For comparison purposes, words per minute translates directly to
baud rate on an async serial line, e.g. 185 * 6 * 10 / 60 = 185 baud.

Back in my "phogie" days, I used to overrun the buffers on 110 baud
current loop equipment (e.g. VT52, TI Silent 700), unless I
consciously paced myself down.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908060822.BAA02979>