Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:12:53 +0200 From: "Leif Neland" <leif@neland.dk> To: <chris@calldei.com> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 2 inetd's with 2 nics Message-ID: <000b01c00549$bcb05c80$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> References: <004401c00543$50c661a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> <20000813113112.A41275@holly.calldei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Costello" <chris@calldei.com> To: "Leif Neland" <leif@neland.dk> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 6:31 PM Subject: Re: 2 inetd's with 2 nics > On Sunday, August 13, 2000, Leif Neland wrote: > > Is it possible and a good idea to have one inetd for the inside nic and > > another with fewer services for the outside on a gateway machine, > > or should I just use ipfw/ipchain for this? > > From the inetd man page: > > -a Specify a specific IP address to bind to. Alternatively, a host- > name can be specified, in which case the IPv4 or IPv6 address > which corresponds to that hostname is used. Usually a hostname > is specified when inetd is run inside a jail(8), in which case > the hostname corresponds to the jail(8) environment. > Yes, I know this. But is it a good idea to have separate inetd's for inside and outside? Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000b01c00549$bcb05c80$0e00a8c0>