Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 01:45:46 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> To: don@PartsNow.com Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal) Message-ID: <19971112014546.43531@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <3468FAD1.49A8@PartsNow.com>; from Don Wilde on Tue, Nov 11, 1997 at 04:39:45PM -0800 References: <199711110620.XAA15169@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199711110645.XAA02334@usr03.primenet.com> <199711111652.JAA16566@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199711111836.TAA22576@bitbox.follo.net> <199711111935.MAA17390@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199711112339.AAA23291@bitbox.follo.net> <3468FAD1.49A8@PartsNow.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 11, 1997 at 04:39:45PM -0800, Don Wilde wrote: > As I remember, the prayer experiment was very well prepared. The > pray-ees didn't know they were being prayed for, and the pray-er's > didn't know who they were praying for, except a first name and a general > description of the problem. The groups were statistically equal, and > relatively large. If I remember [too many bosses whizzing past FTL, > Amancio], there were a total of 400 in the study. Do you remember who conducted it, or at least their general affliction? Size of population group for those praying and being prayed for? Were they in the same group, or so spread out it shouldn't be statistically significant contact between them? Were the study double-blind? Eivind, considering this fairly interesting.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971112014546.43531>