Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      07 Feb 2002 00:59:14 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Kevin.Lyons@kvaerner.com
Cc:        jan@caustic.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Historical /usr/local
Message-ID:  <xzplme65fhp.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <B162615B7188D511955F00805F8B207840CFC4@KOGFD-MSX01>
References:  <B162615B7188D511955F00805F8B207840CFC4@KOGFD-MSX01>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kevin.Lyons@kvaerner.com writes:
> /usr is "local" to the machine.  /usr/local is also "local".  I guess the
> only case when /usr is not local is if its nfs mounted-but that can't be the
> reason.  I realize the convention is that add-on programs go to /usr/local
> similar to /opt in slowaris but the terminology or historical basis eludes
> me.

/usr/local contains site-local binaries and data, i.e. binaries and
data that are not part of the operating system itself but have been
developed locally or obtained from third-party vendors.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplme65fhp.fsf>