Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:34 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Cc: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? Message-ID: <4679A3BE.9000807@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <a9f4a3860706201256s5c4543d6t93448c9c12cf3439@mail.gmail.com> References: <E745210E-A5B8-48E0-B6A8-A467F1054BD7@svcolo.com> <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <a9f4a3860706201040u1f7e89eane68a7588cd017b96@mail.gmail.com> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> <a9f4a3860706201256s5c4543d6t93448c9c12cf3439@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kurt Buff wrote: [...] > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages > noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as > well? I think that topic is not about "how we can do it another way", but why this patch was not commited. This patch doesn't change current behavior, but allows operator to choose another behavior. Allowing more choices is always good thing, so I am for commiting this patch. Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4679A3BE.9000807>