Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:57:36 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, lev@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck? Message-ID: <503288A0.8020705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50323C5F.5090109@FreeBSD.org> References: <157941699.20120815004542@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmon86-FPs4%2BXXkQXAow1jW465pMM2Sj7ZHi_0_E9VYSFSA@mail.gmail.com> <502AE8B5.9090106@FreeBSD.org> <502B775D.7000101@FreeBSD.org> <5031F636.1020405@FreeBSD.org> <50320A9E.5070303@FreeBSD.org> <503210A1.7010803@FreeBSD.org> <50323C5F.5090109@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/20/2012 06:32, Alexander Motin wrote:
> I have no plans to converge them. I've just found problem in ULE, that
> was replicated into 4BSD and it would be strange to fix one without
> another. But fixing it exposed another old problem specific to 4BSD,
> which I fixed reusing logically equivalent code from ULE. I saw no
> reason to reinvent a wheel there, same as to not fix obvious bug. Sure,
> it can change behavior in some way, but ULE is not guilty.
Thank you for that explanation.
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
I can do.
-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503288A0.8020705>