Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:02:10 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ar.4 missing
Message-ID:  <20040829200210.GB39813@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20040829195348.GC760@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References:  <20040827180724.GZ24054@arved.at> <20040827182012.GD774@zaphod.nitro.dk> <1093631012.634.5.camel@tl.kom.tuwien.ac.at> <20040827184829.GE774@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20040827202755.GZ37255@submonkey.net> <20040828013249.7b3f1de7@localhost.pittgoth.com> <20040829195348.GC760@zaphod.nitro.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2004.08.28 01:32:49 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:27:55 +0100
> > Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote:
> >=20
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:48:29PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > > > On 2004.08.27 20:23:32 +0200, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
> > > > > Am Fr, den 27.08.2004 schrieb Simon L. Nielsen um 20:20:
> > > > > > On 2004.08.27 20:07:25 +0200, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Noticed that ar.4 is missing, although mentioned in ata.4, pl=
ease commit or
> > > > > > > approve this small diff:
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~arved/stuff/ar.diff
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > That's unfortunatly not the right solution... since we have ano=
ther
> > > > > > ar(4) device, which is a NIC driver: :-/
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > >      ar -- synchronous Digi/Arnet device driver
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > It is very unfortunate IMO, but I think it's way to late to fix.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Oops, you are right, i was confused because the NIC driver is i38=
6 only,
> > > > > and i tried "man 4 ar" on amd64.
> > > > > So maybe add the MLINKS only on !i386?
> > > >=20
> > > > I'm not really sure if that would break POLA (as in, confusing peop=
le
> > > > more).  I have CC'ed ru, perhaps he (or someone else) has a good id=
ea
> > > > on how to make this situation better.
> > >=20
> > > Personally, I don't see a problem with having "man 4 ar" give you
> > > something different on, say, sparc64 and i386; I vaguely remember a
> > > similar discussion when the second ar driver was added, and the
> > > conclusion was that this wouldn't be a problem, I believe.
>=20
> OK, that's fine with me then, and since Ruslan hasn't complained I
> assume he has no strong feelings against it :-).
>=20
I did complain.  Did you miss my email?


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBMjZCqRfpzJluFF4RAoGuAJ4jBpXF1IeCjspahOo3Q2unCqbzhQCggbj5
BIMrRw7e+HXG6TeRrhvNEL0=
=qdVz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040829200210.GB39813>