Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:00:26 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: svn commit: r216746 - head/sys/conf Message-ID: <AANLkTimmQyr91LDYqB_iSUCzHZQBC5shaof48suJMDWJ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D1A1EDC.8010603@bsdimp.com> References: <201012272352.oBRNqeEb040247@svn.freebsd.org> <20101228015905.GA81514@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4D194551.7000004@freebsd.org> <20101228020900.GA81611@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4D1A1EDC.8010603@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> On 12/27/2010 19:09, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:02:57PM -0800, Colin Percival wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/27/10 17:59, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:52:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> =A0 Make it possible to specify WITHOUT_MODULES in a kernel config fi=
le.
>>>>
>>>> Can you explain how this differs from
>>>> makeoptions =A0 =A0 NO_MODULES
>>>> which has been able to do for years?
>>>
>>> NO_MODULES means what it says: No modules.
>>>
>>> WITHOUT_MODULES=3D"foo bar baz" means "go ahead and build modules excep=
t
>>> for foo,
>>> bar, and baz".
>>>
>> Thanks. =A0The distincion wasn't clear from the commit log.
>> I read it as "Build a kernel WITHOUT building MODULES",
>> which is what NO_MODULES does.
>
> which is why I'd like to have its name changed: it is confusing this way.=
..
Wouldn't it be better to have MODULES_EXCLUDE and MODULES_INCLUDE
or something along those lines? MODULES_OVERRIDE doesn't really have a
nice clean antonym to go with it according to my friendly neighborhood
thesaurus.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimmQyr91LDYqB_iSUCzHZQBC5shaof48suJMDWJ>