Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:56:11 -0600 From: Gnu_Raiz <gnu.raiz@gmail.com> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Z00Q Problem Tyan MB! Message-ID: <c740cf110512230956t4aefb80dw2f7252af83ea9bb7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43AC2E52.8000304@root.org> References: <c740cf110512211223s4b7d7c59n387b1dfedd62567b@mail.gmail.com> <20051222020349.GA16607@poupinou.org> <43AC2E52.8000304@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/23/05, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: > > <snip> > > You can work around this problem with info from PR kern/89879 > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/acer_ferrari/ > > A future acpica import may address this problem. The aml is accessing a > field before it's defined. The newest acpica adds support for lazy > evaluation (even though this is out of spec). > > -- > Nate I did see that in my research, since it was a laptop, and a different chipset I thought it would not be aplicable to my Tyan board. I might play around with his .asl file, but I am still at a loss as what do with it. Just running a diff on the two version creates a 284K file. I really am at = a loss, I have no idea where to start. Gnu_Raiz rcall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c740cf110512230956t4aefb80dw2f7252af83ea9bb7>