Date: 13 Mar 2002 20:26:17 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X11 required for Document Project? Message-ID: <cvlmcv93me.mcv@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20020314014952.45C7C3E3C@bazooka.trit.org> References: <20020314014952.45C7C3E3C@bazooka.trit.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> writes: > "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > > The full list of packages needed by docproj (minus jadetex and its > > dependencies) is in /usr/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports. > ^^^^ > I think you mean "should be in". For example, python isn't listed. > This file is a good idea, but it gets out of date despite our best > efforts. In case anyone doesn't know about "pkg_tree" or "portupgrade -nR": pkg_tree -v docproj | grep -v docproj | tr -d '|\\_ ' | sort -u gives a list of dependencies. (I wouldn't think "-v" should be needed, but without it, XFree86 and python were omitted.) I notice several differences on my STABLE-05-mar system: Only Makefile.inc.docport has Mk unzip gettext gmake libtool ghostscript-gnu docbook while only pkg_tree (on my sys about 05'mar) gives XFree86 XFree86-libraries docbook ghostscript-afpl **probably my fault imake jade python xhtml Then I tried "portupgrade -nR": Only Makefile.inc.docport has Mk unzip gettext gmake libtool ghostscript-gnu while only "portupgrade -nR" (on my sys about 05'mar) gives imake-4 ghostscript-afpl jade xhtml XFree86-4-libraries I think my ports are in good shape (but a week old). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cvlmcv93me.mcv>