Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 22:11:59 -0500 From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com> To: time.cdrom.com!jkh@dg-rtp.dg.com, lakes!rivers Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Probable problem with SL/IP installations (ifconfig sl0 not run.) Message-ID: <199512050311.WAA03657@lakes>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Oh... I was confusing 2.1-STABLE with 2.1-RELEASE. I suppose, > > at some time in the not too distant past, these two were the same > > (since RELEASE came from STABLE, right?) But, I take it, STABLE > > has marched on. > > No, I think you were looking in 2.2-CURRENT since the code in -STABLE > matches the release code, modulo a few fixes I made post 2.1. > > Jordan > Well - to be explicit - I simply logged into freefall.cdrom.com and looked in /usr/src/release/sysinstall. Whatever is there is what I looked at. I assumed that since uname on freefall returned 2.1-STABLE, that's what I was looking at... so much for assuming :-) - Thanks for setting me straight - - Dave R. -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512050311.WAA03657>