Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:09:09 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: avg@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UPDATING 20110730 Message-ID: <4e369765.T%2BNLcZoj2rV7wQkF%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4E35ADA3.40401@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E345DBD.1090503@FreeBSD.org> <4E34B0BB.9050008@FreeBSD.org> <4E353A46.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <4E35A998.5060102@FreeBSD.org> <4E35ADA3.40401@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > If for X ports all the relevant data under /var/db/pkg fits into > fs cache, then the performance may be blazing, but once you exceed > the cache size the performance might become totally different. and/or the poorly-performing system may have enough less memory than the other for paging/swapping to be a factor.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4e369765.T%2BNLcZoj2rV7wQkF%perryh>