Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:09:17 -0600 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT Message-ID: <1235452157.1273.10.camel@widget.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <200902240100.n1O10L0h095606@freefall.freebsd.org> <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 06:31 +0300, Anonymous wrote: > Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> writes: >=20 > > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COM= MENT > >>=20 > >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 > >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009 > >> Responsible-Changed-Why:=20 > >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > > > > Why do you want a slave port? That is just going to complicate things. >=20 > Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5 > doesn't include >=20 > libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h > libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h >=20 > As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force > users to only use version from git. >=20 > > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces > > right now. >=20 > As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a > separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch > libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal one > with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically > link with libdrm_nouveau.a. Lets wait and deal with it when that time comes... I will at least have a say in what happens there. Once we have something resembling working nouveau drm code it may become more relevant, but I don't want to go down this path right now if we don't have to. robert. > > > > robert. --=20 Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD --=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmjgP0ACgkQM4TrQ4qfROM0AwCfdT4IKxFWc0YFQD0imMsuCf6T oRgAn2VDCH4TS0Lxv8uMrG7kbn170sHO =feX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1235452157.1273.10.camel>