Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:39:22 -0600 From: James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail_set_vimage - Vimage under new jails Message-ID: <487BFFCA.4090105@gritton.org> In-Reply-To: <487BEB21.6040407@elischer.org> References: <487BE548.3050500@gritton.org> <487BEB21.6040407@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'd like to have "jail_set versions" of a lot of what's out there - certainly what's being currently worked on. My next target is Bjoern Zeeb's multi-ip/no-ip/ipv6 extension (actually, I've got no-ip already). But I don't want to turn it all into one grand jail_set patch without buy-in, as I don't know which patches have what kind of support. Some things like vimage work well as prison services, using the provided jail layering and remaining their own separate things. But most of the jail patches are extensions to the base jail stuff itself, and would make more sense to just add to the existing jail code. Some of these changes re-appear in different forms in different patches. - Jamie Julian Elischer wrote: > One question I have is to do with Jails in general. > There are a lot of other patches floating around with > jails features. How many of those patches are going to be > incorporated?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487BFFCA.4090105>