Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 16:06:43 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: terry@lambert.org, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, phk@critter.tfs.com, julian@ref.tfs.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION Message-ID: <199602092306.QAA11482@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <21806.823905649@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 9, 96 02:40:49 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Terry, I'm wondering if you've gone blind here again or something > because I've said *several* times that there's NO PROBLEM WITH > DEPLOYING IT RIGHT NOW, JUST DON'T MAKE IT FRIGGIN' *MANDATORY* YET > UNTIL IT'S FIXED! > > I'm hoping that capital letters will penetrate your cranium since no > other forms of explanation seem to have succeeded so far! :-) OK. Don't make devfs mandatory. Make it optional and included by default. But make specfs optional and excluded by default... The same way procfs wasn't mandatory for a long time. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602092306.QAA11482>