Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:34:35 +0100 (BST)
From:      Jim Dixon <jdd@vbc.net>
To:        Chris Watson <scanner@webspan.net>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BGP on a cisco 2500 series
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960619002607.11078G-100000@uk1.vbc.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.93.960618181001.28545B-100000@orion.webspan.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Chris Watson wrote:

> I saw this topic discussed briefly on one of the lists.
> I didnt pay much attention till now. My boss wants to go multihomed and
> run BGP. We have a 2501 cisco router, and i'm pretty confident theres no
> way on gods green earth we can do it on a 2501. both serials are used.
> And i dont think it has the ability to hold a full routing table?

I think that a full routing table takes about 6 MB these days.  The
Cisco 2501 comes with 2 MB and you can add 16 MB for something like $300
if you don't buy the SIMM from Cisco.  Use one Cisco to handle one feed
and the other Cisco to handle the other feed.  If you get a lot of route
flaps, increase the dampening.

This approach saves money and gives you real fault-tolerance.  Either 
provider or either Cisco can fail and you won't go down.  I would also
put them on separate UPSs.

--
Jim Dixon              VBCnet GB Ltd +44 117 929 1316  fax +44 117 927 2015
http://www.uk.vbc.net  VBCnet West   +1  408 971 2682  fax +1  408 971 2684




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSD/.3.91.960619002607.11078G-100000>