Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:44:16 -0700
From:      Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
Cc:        "Georg-W. Koltermann" <Georg.Koltermann@mscsoftware.com>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD OS version for HotSpot (was: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready)
Message-ID:  <20020710234416.GD2394@gnuppy.monkey.org>
In-Reply-To: <15660.50045.80305.351508@emerger.yogotech.com>
References:  <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA83A@l04.research.kpn.com> <20020710102904.GA3882@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1026333648.676.22.camel@hunter.muc.macsch.com> <20020710232517.GB2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.50045.80305.351508@emerger.yogotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:30:05PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > The stuff that's in our CVS is only for -stable with a rather bad bug
> > fix patch of mine to libc_r. It's better all around to use -current or
> > -current's libc_r for this purpose instead of the -stable's libc_r.
> > Somebody will have to backport it to -stable like I said before.
> > 
> > I'm about to remove all of that stuff (-stable support) in the CVSs,
> > so Greg's patch might be dated when it comes out.
> 
> Why?

Because working with -stable's libc_r is too problematic. Something
close to the real solution is to backport -current's libc_r or merge
the changes to it to -stable...

bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020710234416.GD2394>