Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Nov 1997 10:30:06 -0600
From:      Bruce Albrecht <bruce.albrecht@seag.fingerhut.com>
To:        Sean Kelly <kelly@fsl.noaa.gov>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Prefered X Window Manager?
Message-ID:  <199711121630.KAA27012@gf006e0.seag.fingerhut.com>
In-Reply-To: <3469D44C.B1D829B@fsl.noaa.gov>
References:  <000701bce570$9ed09960$0100a8c0@einstein.cybersurf.net> <lwra91akaj.fsf@terror.hungry.com> <199711120429.WAA19960@zuhause.mn.org> <3469D44C.B1D829B@fsl.noaa.gov>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean Kelly writes:
 > [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
 > > Sorry to restart this thread, but I was wondering if any of the WMs
 > > other than olvwm support pushtack in the frame menu so that pop-up
 > > windows stick around after one clicks on the "OK" (or whatever) button
 > > that normally causes the window to go away.  I'm not all that fond of
 > > olvwm, but that's one thing I liked about it.
 > 
 > OpenLook achieves that with the WM_DELETE_WINDOW protocol, so you can use
 > just about any window manager out there.  For example, mwm users would
 > choose "Close" to achieve the same effect.

I don't know the exact mechanics, but the olvwm feature I was referring to
allows one to indicate that the window should not go away even if the
program deletes it.  Sort of the opposite of "Close".



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711121630.KAA27012>