Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:41:32 +0200
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        Marcin Wisnicki <mwisnicki+freebsd@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit problems with sourceforge due to svn
Message-ID:  <4BBA4AFC.3030006@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <hpconu$eji$3@dough.gmane.org>
References:  <4BB99A84.60108@bsdforen.de> <hpcodo$eji$2@dough.gmane.org> <hpconu$eji$3@dough.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/04/2010 15:31, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:26:16 +0000, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:08:36 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> It seems svn is linked to both the base system version of OpenSSL
>>> (0.9.8k) and the package (1.0.0):
>>>> ldd /usr/local/bin/svn |grep ssl
>>> 	libssl.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x801c8f000) libssl.so.6 =>
>>> 	/usr/lib/libssl.so.6 (0x803242000)
>>
>>
>>> Does someone know a workaround/fix?
>>
>> Deinstall openssl package and rebuild svn.
>>
> 
> Also if the problem is reproducible - that is, svn being linked to both
> versions of openssl if package is installed, you should definitely file
> a bug against devel/subversion port.

I have libmapped .so.6 to .so.7, which works (so I forced the port
instead of the base install). It doesn't work the other way.

I don't think svn is directly linked to both versions of OpenSSL,
I think SVN is linked to one and a linked library is linked to the
other version of OpenSSL.

Regards

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BBA4AFC.3030006>