Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 12:32:31 -0700 (PDT) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org To: Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Message-ID: <ML-3.4.939497551.1051.patl@asimov> In-Reply-To: <19991009191658.F2E941D87@bone.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9-Oct-99 at 12:17, Jacques Vidrine (n@nectar.com) wrote: > If those folks that privately mailed me and asked that this work be > done would stand up now, that would be nice :-) I didn't privately mail you; but I would like to speak up as someone who is -very- interested in seeing this functionality available much sooner than we can expect 4.x to become -stable. [ Normally, I wouldn't bother the list with a 'Me Too' type post; but since Jacques did ask, and since most of the posts have been negative reactions to the potential disruption that would be caused if the suser interface changed, I thought it was time to de-lurk. ] > From the sounds of things, it would be easier for some to swallow if I > came up with a different set of patches that don't change the > interface of suser, and maintain two suser implementations for another > 5 or 6 months --- although I don't know that we can say for sure when > 4.0 will become -STABLE. That's my reading of the postings; and it sounds like a reasonable approach. -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ML-3.4.939497551.1051.patl>