Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Feb 2002 04:15:38 +1000
From:      Ian Pulsford <ianjp@optusnet.com.au>
To:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: diskless freebsd cluster
Message-ID:  <3C62C44A.D63FB405@optusnet.com.au>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202070937520.4970-100000@sargon.photon.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Wilbur wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just wanted to say, to the entire FreeBSD team, especially everyone
> involved with pxe support, rc.diskless[1,2], mfs, and gigabit nic support,
> THANKS!  You ROCK!
> 
> I just got a 16 node diskless cluster of 1.4GHz Athlons (dual 1GHz p3
> server) up and running 4.5-RELEASE, and it was SO much easier than it used
> to be..
> 
> The cluster has two "primary" uses, one is to do high volume number
> crunching, the other is for a parallelized port of one of our
> toolkits for a particular customer, who is insisting on a Scyld Linux
> "beowulf".  The original plan was to port our crunching codes from FreeBSD
> to Linux (sigh), but since it took about a day to build a second system
> disk running FreeBSD (and a port would've taken at least a week or two),
> that is far more cost effective in the short.  Hopefully I can build a
> mini scyld cluster for development only and we can stick with FreeBSD..
> 
> Why diskless?  We're doing diskless because the codes we're currently
> using are CPU intensive, with little file i/o, and because the lab it's
> operating in has restricted access, its far easier to operate diskless for
> media accounting reasons, especially if/when N goes from 16 to say,
> 64..or if we want to wheel the rack out of the lab and operate
> "outside".  I'm getting 97% user CPU on all nodes when I hammer the system
> with runs, I can live with that..  The network is 100baseT to the client
> nodes, 1000baseSX server->switch.
> 
> For what it's worth, the crunching used to happen on Origin 200s.  Of two
> primary codes we run, code A would take about the same time on freebsd on
>  a p3-1GHz as it did on a 270MHz r12000.  Code B ran three times faster
> on a p3-1GHz than on the 270MHz r12k.  Our cost savings are phenomenal
> using commodity hardware and a great OS.
> 
> If anyone would find the setup/configuration of interest I can document
> how I set it up and throw it up somewhere for your perusal..

It would be neat if you could turn this into a Daemon news article. 
(BTW, I'm not the one to contact.)

Ian

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C62C44A.D63FB405>