Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 02:25:53 +0000 From: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org> To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> Cc: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>, freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The ultimate board! Message-ID: <3ADA5831.A4DE0E1B@aurora.regenstrief.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104151521190.9743-100000@www.everquick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Eddy, you wrote > My point was that I like Tulips... I'd expect 2x Tulip to cost a little > more than 3x SiS (NS now that I actually read dmesg output). If it works > and gets the job done, I'm happy. Well, but I *need* 3 ethernet ports, so, I prefer having three that just work over 2 tulips that also work :-) > Have you had a chance to test forwarding rate, in both Mbps and fps? You mean just packet forwarding and a little routing without any encryption? I can do that, although I might need four or more computers to actually create traffic w/o being themselves overloaded. I'll try to set something up. What is the rate that I should expect? Is there a standardized benchmark that I should use? (I have my own UDP streaming test tool that I use to measure bandwidths.) thanks, -Gunther -- Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow@regenstrief.org Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care Adjunct Assistent Professor Indiana University School of Medicine tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ADA5831.A4DE0E1B>