Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/19245: -fexpensive-optimizations buggy (even with -O) Message-ID: <200108292210.f7TMA1G12757@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR i386/19245; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: mike@FreeBSD.org, bde@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/19245: -fexpensive-optimizations buggy (even with -O) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 18:07:06 -0400 (EDT) > The main reason reason is that I wasn't sure that it was not a FreeBSD > bug. There is now a near-duplicate of this PR (gnu/30181) which says > that the bug is in both the FreeBSD port and original GNU version > of gcc-2.95.3, and analyses generated code to locate the wrong > instructions. It's clear that it is a gcc bug. But on the Mandrake the same code compiles correctly -- that's what I don't understand. In fact, that's the only reason I filed the PR at all -- I know about optimization problems in gcc in general. Did Mandrake patch the compiler somehow? Can we incorporate their fix? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108292210.f7TMA1G12757>