Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:12:19 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> Cc: Marty Gordon <KILLSPAM%mlghome@home.com>, Wee Teck Ng <weeteck@eecs.umich.edu>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980218090826.19271C-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <199802180725.AAA08524@pluto.plutotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >I'm shocked to hear that Western Digital SCSI drives rate really low. All > >my illusions (delusions?) are shattered. Who is King of the Mountain for > >SCSI-3 drives in terms of reliability and performance? I have a Fast/Wide > >controller and I am looking at drives. > > Without a doubt, IBM. I have some doubts about that. Seagate Barracuda work really well too. 20 drives in 24x7 so far, and no failures. Of course, anything is better than cheap Quantum junk. Of the 5 or so, Quantum drives we have, one is dead and one is "unreliable". > >Thanks, > >Marty > >mlghome@home.com > > -- > Justin Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980218090826.19271C-100000>