Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:41:31 +0200 From: Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no To: grog@lemis.com Cc: seebs@plethora.net, FreeBSD-advocacy@freebsd.org, netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG, advocacy@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Document: What's the difference between Linux and BSD? Message-ID: <20000428144131G.he@runit.sintef.no> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:02:22 %2B0200" <20000428140222P.he@runit.sintef.no> References: <20000428140222P.he@runit.sintef.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Earlier I wrote: > However, at the moment, there is no AT&T code left in the freely > available BSDs, so what makes it then a derivative? Won't this > statement perpetuate the misunderstanding that the freely available > BSDs are still under threat of litigation from AT&T? Hmm, I see I should have read the entire paper before commenting. I need to learn to keep my mouth shut. Sorry 'bout that. - H=E5vard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000428144131G.he>