Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 May 2003 21:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:      David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Mario <lioux@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: conf/51910: ucom0 should be generated by MAKEDEV all
Message-ID:  <20030507045759.90653.qmail@web13509.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030506213717.L5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2003, David Yeske wrote:
> 
> > ucom0 is not generated from MAKEDEV all
> 
> You haven't said why this is a problem. Since most users don't have these
> devices, it's probably up to the ones who do to deal with this. Just a
> thought.
> 
> Doug

Most users don't have urio0 or umodem0, should we remove those from being generated from MAKEDEV
all? When should a device be in MAKEDEV, but not be generated via MAKEDEV all?


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030507045759.90653.qmail>