Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:44:36 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <almarrie@gmail.com> Cc: "youshi10@u.washington.edu" <youshi10@u.washington.edu>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 Message-ID: <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0706041119o6c290fb3k7f234492df2f6548@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0706041428260.27541@hymn02.u.washington.edu> <499c70c0706041441q4d4f13adtebd979ec87f71558@mail.gmail.com> <466488F0.9070802@FreeBSD.org> <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Attilio, > > Thanks for explaining the issue deeper. > > So is fixing this issue would make FreeBSD runs apps faster than Linux > or we will get the same result that linux offers now? This is not intended to improve the quickness of a program per-se (I'm not saying it is impossible to happen, just that it would be a side effect), but it is intended to improve scalabilty. I expect a very good boost up on scalabilty for us by these jeff's efforts, but quantify now is not very simple. Time will say better than me. Attilio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46653084.7080502>