Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:24:38 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys" Message-ID: <20090801142438.65cabd8d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4A740679.1020608@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <4A740679.1020608@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:10:17 +0100 Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from > Freshports saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had > PORTREVISION bumps because of the jpeg update. Which is all fine and > dandy, except that these were the www/p5-RT-* extension modules for > RT. > ... Actually, I think his point was that the ports were bumped too long after the jpeg update, when people had already done the recursive upgrade.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090801142438.65cabd8d>