Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:11:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: BIND 9.4.1 imported Message-ID: <20070603090620.Q38838@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <46627FF2.6030404@FreeBSD.org> References: <46620099.4080007@FreeBSD.org> <1438422832.20070603120837@citrin.ru> <46627FF2.6030404@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Doug Barton wrote: Hi, > Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >> Hello Doug, >> >> You wrote on Sunday, June 3, 2007, 3:43:21 AM: >> >> DB> After extensive testing, I've upgraded the BIND in the base to version >> DB> 9.4.1. This version contains a lot of performance improvements, >> DB> especially for threading, so I've re-enabled it by default. >> >> Is there knobs to build bind without threads? > > I wasn't planning to add one, but if someone can show me convincing > proof that it's needed, I will be glad to do so. > > Why would you not want it to be threaded? I haven't checked which part (apart from named) might need libpthread (or equivalent). One thing comes to my mind: having installations without a thread library installed as in WITHOUT_LIBC_R= WITHOUT_LIBPTHREAD= WITHOUT_LIBTHR= (or whatever an up-to-date current would be). I remember that at least pppctl is one of the few other programs that needs a threading library in base. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070603090620.Q38838>