Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:17:59 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vlink.ru> Cc: Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net> Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs Message-ID: <20050310191759.GI34206@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <87sm33z55v.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> References: <200503091838.06322.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> <87sm33z55v.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:12:28PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > >>>>> "Andy" == Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net> writes: > > >> nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow. > > Andy> What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this? > > Just ran build of databases/mysql41-server in a jail with nullfs > mounted /bin /sbin /lib etc over r/w nfs mounted sandbox. And compared it to what? What was your NFS setup? What measurements did you obtain? Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050310191759.GI34206>