Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:39:22 +0800
From:      "Rong-en Fan" <grafan@gmail.com>
To:        "Josh Paetzel" <josh@tcbug.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: is read-write nullfs safe?
Message-ID:  <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org>
References:  <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
> > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
> > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
> > Is this still the case?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rong-En Fan
>
> I've been using r/w nullfs in production for ages without issue...sure
> you're not confusing nullfs with unionfs?

I'm aware that unionfs status and I think it's usable
in 7.x, right?

I was asking about nullfs because the following lines
in sys/conf/NOTES:

# NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be
# buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with
# them.  They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising
# soul to sit down and fix them.

Regards,
Rong-En Fan
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Josh Paetzel
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba>