Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:47:38 -0700
From:      "Aaron D. Gifford" <astounding@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/144568: Ruby 1.9.1 has rubygems version 1.3.1 built in, but  some gems require a newer version. 1.3.5 is available by the ports, but needs the following changes.
Message-ID:  <e58000751003091747l4717d14en64f114e96a0e9721@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e58000751003081753o1054d828i24a466e37aff7321@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201003090121.o291Lu17079143@www.freebsd.org> <201003090130.o291U0IX016619@freefall.freebsd.org> <e58000751003081753o1054d828i24a466e37aff7321@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Okay, that patch has a few typos...   i.e. RUBYS_VAR (wrong) instead
of RUBY_SVAR

Is defining another make variable like RUBY_SVAR the best way to make
sure that installed elements named after the installed version of Ruby
are correctly named?  i.e. gem18 or gem19 depending on whether
RUBY_VER is 1.8 or 1.9? Other suggestions?

Hoping Ruby 1.9.1 can be a first class citizen under FreeBSD soon,
Aaron out.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e58000751003091747l4717d14en64f114e96a0e9721>