Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 10:49:34 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: darklogik@pittgoth.com Cc: Ross Lippert <ripper@eskimo.com>, blackend@freebsd.org, cjuniet@entreview.com, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/41106: FreeBSD Handbook lacks "Desktop Applications" chapter. Message-ID: <3D4E9E8E.8080505@centtech.com> References: <200208051455.HAA18220@eskimo.com> <3D4E9C88.7040308@centtech.com> <3D4E9E06.8000201@pittgoth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Rhodes wrote: > > It sounds impossible with over 7000 ports and only around 100 port > committers. Considering feature changes when ports are updated, along > with the fact that a handful of people just don't use the ports they > Maintain, just make sure it builds ;) > > Lets not make the FreeBSD committer's jobs more difficult than they > already are :P WO! I'm not suggesting the ports committers would do this in addition! I'm suggesting we have separate volunteers for this function - basically, anyone can submit a "port review", and there would be a small number of people actually committing the port reviews to the site. There are 7000 ports, that are maintained, committed, etc, by how many port committers? I'm certain that not all would be reviewed (although that would be nice), and that committing a review would not be as time consuming as tracking a port itself, so I don't think it would require that many people to "commit" the port reviews. I'm of course offering to do it. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small stain. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D4E9E8E.8080505>