Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:09:41 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ATAPI (was: Who needs Perl? We do!)
Message-ID:  <199611240909.KAA09943@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199611240424.OAA24031@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from Michael Smith at "Nov 24, 96 02:54:53 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Michael Smith wrote:

> So, to deal with the "AV" crowd, whose hardware often can't handle
> being starved of data for several hundred ms, drive manufacturers made
> the recalibration process interruptible, so that data operations
> continue and recalibration occurs in the "background".

Makes me wonder: now that they _know_ the technology to perform the
thermal recalibration in background, it doesn't cost the manufacturer
any more.  So why don't they simply ship all drives this way?

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611240909.KAA09943>