Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 15:27:35 +1100 From: Joel Sutton <suttonj@interconnect.com.au> To: jlemon@americantv.com (Jonathan Lemon) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doscmd vs ??? Message-ID: <199702030427.PAA05241@solsbury-hill.home> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jan 1997 15:24:10 MDT." <Mutt.19970130152410.jlemon@right.PCS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan, > I have no other Dos programs to run, simply because I don't own any DOS > programs other than Dos5.0 and whatever install/support programs that came > with the various hardware I've bought. If I can be of any assistance with testing please let me know. I've got copies of Wordperfect, MS Word, Lotus , Turbo C/Pascal etc...etc.. I had a play with doscmd and it seemed to run various things that pcemu wouldn't. But it works both ways. The speed is quite superior of course. > (And yes, I'm completely ignorant of intel architecture up until about a > week ago.) Wow. I'm still trying to wrap all of my mind around C... Sometimes it "feels like having your brain smashed out with a slice of lemon wrapped around a large gold brick". :-) Would there be much difficulty is getting a set of kernel patches for us release users (2.1.6) ?? I guess was I'm asking is - Does the new vm86 kernel code rely on facilities in current? I'm really happy to hear that things are going again on the dos emulation front. Thanks. Best regards, Joel...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702030427.PAA05241>