Date: 27 Jan 1999 04:25:02 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: sglass@NASBPD01BS.ntc.nokia.com (Glass Steve NTC/Boston) Cc: jooji@webnology.com (Jasper O'Malley), freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG (freebsd-chat) Subject: Re: When did FreeBSD begin supporting th Message-ID: <xzpr9shqtwx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: sglass@NASBPD01BS.ntc.nokia.com's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:20:56 -0500" References: <1999Jan26.172011.1991.451658@rhino.ntc.nokia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sglass@NASBPD01BS.ntc.nokia.com (Glass Steve NTC/Boston) writes: > Yes, UG-ly (and disgustingly relavent to me here at work). I > tried to get most of the people I communicate regularly with to > use <s.i.c.> (subject Is content), but it has latin > "complications". It isn't too far of a stretch for me, but it > seems to be for others. Maybe I'll try to go with <taf> (yes, > "that's all folks")... What's wrong with just putting "SSIA" (Subject Says It All) in the body, like everyone else does? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr9shqtwx.fsf>