Date: 21 Jun 1999 20:50:03 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@wnm.net Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf] Message-ID: <xzpaettl76s.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Doug's message of "Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:42:46 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906211134240.15079-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug <Doug@gorean.org> writes: > You are really really missing my point here, so I will state it > again. If you have carefully examined the code for *every* case of *every* > internal service, and you have tested it thoroughly, and you are 100% sure > that the man page is in error, change the man page. The confusion arises from the fact that inetd and /etc/services disagree on what the canonical name for the ident service is. Inetd has these canonical names hardcoded in an array of structs, so changing the canonical name in /etc/services does not affect inetd's belief of what the canonical name is. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpaettl76s.fsf>