Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:16:43 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Yoshihiro Koya <Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> Cc: dillon@earth.backplane.com, david@catwhisker.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: time_t definition is worng Message-ID: <20010602091643.C73968@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010603010518C.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp>; from Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp on Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:05:18AM %2B0900 References: <200106012318.f51NI8w38590@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <200106020823.f528N5O98998@earth.backplane.com> <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010603010518C.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:05:18AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > Hello, > > From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> > Subject: Re: time_t definition is worng > Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:52:37 -0700 > Message-ID: <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> > > > Since on IA-32 int == long, the only issue is what ones uses in printf() > > and scanf(). I have not seen anyone having a problem with this yet. > > Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27757 > and the response to this PR. This PR seems to be a signed vs. unsigned issue. Maybe it is too early in the morning, so please explain why int(32-bit) vs. long(32-bit) [on x86] is an issue for this PR. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010602091643.C73968>